Political Affiliation – What do you believe?

First off, if you are reading this post and have hatred in your heart for one party or another, you’re probably in the wrong place.  You’ve been forewarned….

There was a quote recently by a talking head on CNN – the quote (paraphrased) was, “He’s worse than a racist; he’s a libertarian”.  This person was speaking of Rand Paul, of whom I knew little about until he was propelled onto the national scene through his primary win in Kentucky.

The first thought that I had was, ‘What an idiotic premise – that a person was worse than a racist (pretty damn bad from my perspective) because they believed in a set of political principles.”  I was sufficiently interested to make myself aware of the range of modern American political process.  Here I share with you what I learned.

There are two primary groups that drive the discussion in America – The Individualist and the Collectivist.   I am purposely avoiding party names as that reference is meaningless in today’s world.  From the Collectivist, the groups include Communist, Socialist, Fascist, Statist and any other line of thinking that posit the ‘State’ should be primarily responsible for the welfare and care of citizens in the country in question.  The Individualist brings in groups such as Libertarians, Conservatives and so called Independents who posit that individuals in a free society should be primarily responsible for the welfare of themselves and their families and communities.

The Wrong Prescription – repost

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/246198/wrong-prescription-andrew-stuttaford

The Corner

The Wrong Prescription
September 10, 2010 9:59 A.M.
By Andrew Stuttaford
Oh dear:

Sheriffs in North Carolina want access to state computer records identifying anyone with prescriptions for powerful painkillers and other controlled substances.

North Carolina’s sheriffs quite obviously have way too much time on their hands, but even if we ignore the insult to privacy concerns implicit in the sheriffs’ suggestion (not to speak of the stupidity of widening the “war on drugs” still further), there’s something else to consider. Reason’s Radley Balko explains:

[L]aw enforcement officials’ definition of over-prescribing has sharply diverged from that of pain professionals. High-dose opiate therapy, a promising new treatment for chronic pain, has basically been cut off at the knees because of high-profile cases in which DEA officials, U.S. attorneys, and state and local law enforcement with no medical training have taken it upon themselves to decide what is and isn’t appropriate treatment.

And the problem is self-perpetuating. As more doctors leave pain management out of fear, those left feel pressure to take on more patients. And the fewer doctors willing to prescribe pain patients the meds they need, the more doctors legitimate patients need to see to get proper treatment. Both are consequences of bad policy. And both are then considered by law enforcement to be signs of abuse.

Letting cops go fishing in patient databases for these “red flags” is only going to make it all worse. Sure, they may well find a few unscrupulous doctors, and perhaps some people who are using doctors to feed an addiction. But one thing that’s almost certain to happen is that doctors are going to become even more fearful that every script is going to be scrutinized. Which means fewer of them will be willing to write them. Which means more pain patients are going to suffer, despite the fact that there are drugs available to help them.

And what will the supposedly science-friendly Obama administration do about the examples of this sort of overreach at the federal level? Let’s see.